Immigrants from Israel vs Burmese Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Burmese
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Burmese
5.0%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Burmese Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,589,874 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.509 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,476,720 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.87% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 7.1% | 9.3% |
| Range | 6.3% | 8.2% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 4.2% |
| Median | 3.9% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Burmese by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from China (5.1%, a difference of 0.63%), Cypriot (5.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from India (5.1%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Australia (5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Latvian (5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bhutanese (5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Japan (5.2%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Armenians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.7 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.3% |