Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Finnish Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Finnish
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Finns
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Finnish Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,892,306 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,250,677 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 17.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Finnish |
| Minimum | 0.24% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 4.0% | 4.6% |
| Range | 3.7% | 4.0% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 2.1% |
| Median | 1.7% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.8% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.35% | 0.76% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.48% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.48% | 0.79% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Singapore (1.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Iranian (1.8%, a difference of 0.93%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (1.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Israel (1.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Iran (1.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Finns by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Immigrants from Sudan (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Italian (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Colombian (2.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Belgian (2.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (2.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Sierra Leoneans | 84.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.1% |
| South Americans | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Ukrainians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Italians | 79.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 78.4 /100 | #147 | Good 2.1% |
| Finns | 78.3 /100 | #148 | Good 2.1% |
| Colombians | 76.2 /100 | #149 | Good 2.1% |
| Belgians | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 75.5 /100 | #151 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 74.6 /100 | #152 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 2.1% |
| Slovenes | 73.6 /100 | #154 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 2.1% |