Immigrants from Denmark vs Soviet Union Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Soviet Union
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Soviet Union
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Soviet Union Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,424,948 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.30%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 20.3% | 10.8% |
| Range | 19.6% | 8.2% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 5.3% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Soviet Union by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |