Immigrants from Denmark vs Somali Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Somali
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Somalis
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Somali Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,424,948 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,294,852 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.85%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Somali |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 20.3% | 13.6% |
| Range | 19.6% | 10.2% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 6.0% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Somalis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |