Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Bhutanese Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Bhutanese
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Bhutanese
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Bhutanese Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,412,525 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,630,496 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.44% | 0.28% |
| Maximum | 12.1% | 11.6% |
| Range | 11.7% | 11.4% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.78% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Bhutanese by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Jordan (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Icelander (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Sierra Leonean (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Lithuanian (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Carpatho Rusyn (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), British (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Alsatian (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Croatian (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| British | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.4% |