Immigrants from Cuba vs Central American Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Central American
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Central Americans
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Central American Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,990,586 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,432,725 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.466 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.46%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Central American |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 19.5% | 16.7% |
| Range | 15.7% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 9.3% |
| Median | 10.5% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Central Americans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |