Immigrants from Belarus vs Costa Rican Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Costa Rican
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Costa Ricans
11.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Costa Rican Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,193,098 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,556,053 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.13%.

Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 1.5% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 20.3% |
Range | 27.2% | 16.7% |
Mean | 11.9% | 10.6% |
Median | 11.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Costa Ricans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Bangladesh (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Latvian (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Greece (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Australians | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Latvians | 98.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 98.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 98.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 98.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Costa Ricans | 98.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 97.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.8% |
South Africans | 97.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Brazilians | 97.7 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.6 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 97.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 97.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 97.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.8% |