Immigrants from Africa vs South American Indian Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
South American Indian
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
South American Indians
11.4%
DISABILITY
89.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs South American Indian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,357,699 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,561,915 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.216 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.40%.

Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | South American Indian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 31.3% | 22.9% |
Range | 28.3% | 18.6% |
Mean | 11.5% | 13.1% |
Median | 11.1% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and South American Indians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Arab (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Croatia (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Macedonian (11.4%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are South African (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Brazilian (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |
Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 88.3 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.4% |
Ugandans | 87.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 87.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.4% |
Kenyans | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.5% |