European vs Malaysian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
European
Malaysian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Europeans
Malaysians
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
36.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
28.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Malaysian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,341,631 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,050,790 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.49%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | European | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 0.26% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 16.3% |
| Range | 38.4% | 15.2% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 7.1% |
| Median | 6.9% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans and Malaysians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), British (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |