Czech vs Maltese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Maltese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Czechs
Maltese
16.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Maltese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,743,035 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,468,065 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 0.93%.

Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Maltese |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 32.9% | 20.5% |
| Range | 31.7% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 14.3% |
| Median | 14.1% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Maltese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Filipino (16.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (16.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Croatia (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Lithuanian (16.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Austria (16.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (16.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Greece (16.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Eastern European (16.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Eastern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 16.4% |