Czech vs Argentinean Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Argentinean
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Czechs
Argentineans
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Argentinean Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,678,458 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,904,932 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.72%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Argentinean |
Minimum | 0.83% | 0.24% |
Maximum | 9.4% | 4.5% |
Range | 8.5% | 4.2% |
Mean | 2.9% | 2.1% |
Median | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.85% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 0.80% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Argentineans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Norwegian (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Pakistan (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Jordanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Australian (2.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from France (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Kenyan (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Australians | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | France | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.3% |
New Zealanders | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.3% |