Dutch West Indian vs New Zealander Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
New Zealander
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Dutch West Indians
New Zealanders
18.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs New Zealander Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,769,565 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,922,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 4.0%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch West Indian | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 25.8% | 37.6% |
| Range | 20.5% | 34.5% |
| Mean | 16.5% | 15.6% |
| Median | 17.1% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Immigrants from West Indies (18.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Native/Alaskan (18.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (18.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Africa (18.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Yakama | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Kenyans | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.1 /100 | #290 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #291 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #292 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Central American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #293 | Tragic 18.2% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #294 | Tragic 18.2% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (17.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Haiti (17.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | France | 29.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 27.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 27.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 27.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 17.4% |
| Delaware | 25.6 /100 | #193 | Fair 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 17.4% |
| New Zealanders | 21.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.4% |
| Guyanese | 17.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 16.7 /100 | #197 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.8 /100 | #198 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 14.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 17.5% |
| Haitians | 14.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 17.5% |
| South American Indians | 13.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 12.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.5% |