Choctaw vs Houma Disability Age Under 5
COMPARE
Choctaw
 Houma
 Disability Age Under 5
Disability Age Under 5 Comparison
Choctaw
Houma
1.9%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Houma Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,165,816 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.702 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,359,385 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.231 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 0.32%.
 
Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Houma | 
| Minimum | 0.24% | 0.72% | 
| Maximum | 18.0% | 5.4% | 
| Range | 17.8% | 4.6% | 
| Mean | 5.0% | 2.6% | 
| Median | 3.8% | 2.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 1.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 3.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 1.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Houma by Disability Age Under 5
In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are French Canadian (1.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Chippewa (1.9%, a difference of 0.36%), American (1.9%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (1.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and Sioux (1.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are American (1.9%, a difference of 0.47%), French Canadian (1.9%, a difference of 0.62%), Chippewa (1.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Osage (1.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Sioux (1.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Under 5 | 
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 1.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 1.8%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 1.8%  | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 1.8%  | 
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Paraguayans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 2.0%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 2.0%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 2.2%  |