Chickasaw vs Pima Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Pima
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Pima
2.9%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Pima Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,605,375 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,546 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 2.8%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Pima |
Minimum | 0.38% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 11.8% | 21.0% |
Range | 11.4% | 20.3% |
Mean | 3.9% | 5.2% |
Median | 3.5% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Pima by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Spanish American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (2.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Dominica (2.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Menominee (2.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Cuba (2.8%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Belize (2.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Cree (2.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from West Indies (2.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 2.8% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 2.8% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 2.8% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 2.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 2.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 2.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 2.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 2.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.8% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.8% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.9% |