Cajun vs Cherokee Disability Age Over 75
COMPARE
Cajun
Cherokee
Disability Age Over 75
Disability Age Over 75 Comparison
Cajuns
Cherokee
50.7%
DISABILITY AGE OVER 75
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
50.2%
DISABILITY AGE OVER 75
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Cherokee Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,580,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 50.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,575,562 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 50.2%, a difference of 0.84%.
Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 17.5% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 76.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 58.7% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 52.1% | 60.5% |
| Median | 51.8% | 56.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.1% | 50.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.0% | 71.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 20.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 17.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 17.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Cherokee by Disability Age Over 75
In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Tlingit-Haida (50.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Hispanic or Latino (50.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Aleut (50.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Fiji (50.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Central America (50.5%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Japanese (50.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (50.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Dominican (50.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Cape Verdean (50.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (50.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Over 75 |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 50.0% |
| Armenians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 50.0% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 50.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 50.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 50.1% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 50.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 50.2% |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 50.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 50.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 50.5% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 50.5% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 50.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 50.6% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 50.6% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 50.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 50.7% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 50.9% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 50.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 51.1% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 51.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 51.2% |