Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Belarus 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,744,426 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 76.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,124,439 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142 and weighted average of 83.3%, a difference of 9.2%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Trinidadian and Tobagonian	Immigrants from Belarus
Minimum	33.9%	52.5%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	66.1%	47.5%
Mean	81.5%	90.0%
Median	85.9%	93.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	74.2%	88.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	94.5%	96.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	20.3%	7.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.3%	10.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.2%	10.5%

Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Immigrants from Belarus by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are West Indian (76.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (76.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (76.8%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Dominica (77.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and Ecuadorian (77.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Ghana (83.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Ghanaian (83.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Alaska Native (83.8%, a difference of 0.55%), Soviet Union (82.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and Cypriot (84.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Cypriots	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 84.4%
Alaska Natives	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 83.8%
Ghanaians	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 83.6%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 83.4%
Immigrants \| Belarus	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 83.3%
Soviet Union	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 82.7%
Jamaicans	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 82.1%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 81.6%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 80.5%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 80.4%
Senegalese	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 80.4%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 79.5%
Immigrants \| Senegal	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 79.0%
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 77.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 77.8%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 76.8%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 76.4%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 76.3%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 76.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 74.3%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 74.0%