Scottish vs White/Caucasian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Scottish
White/Caucasian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Scottish
Whites/Caucasians
6.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs White/Caucasian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,431,251 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.702 and weighted average of 6.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,577,305 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.830 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 4.0%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scottish | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 4.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 32.3% |
Range | 97.0% | 27.4% |
Mean | 12.6% | 10.9% |
Median | 6.3% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.5% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Whites/Caucasians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), Scotch-Irish (6.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Dutch (6.8%, a difference of 1.2%), German (6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Czech (6.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mexican (7.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Scandinavian (7.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.0%, a difference of 0.80%), European (7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Welsh (7.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.4% |