Scottish vs Czech No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Scottish
Czech
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Scottish
Czechs
6.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Czech No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,431,251 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.702 and weighted average of 6.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,256,863 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Czech |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.94% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 14.9% |
| Range | 97.0% | 14.0% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 4.6% |
| Median | 6.3% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.6% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Czechs by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), Scotch-Irish (6.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Dutch (6.8%, a difference of 1.2%), German (6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Dutch (6.8%, a difference of 0.55%), Scotch-Irish (6.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Scandinavian (7.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |