Kenyan vs Immigrants from Nicaragua No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Kenyan
Immigrants from Nicaragua
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Kenyans
Immigrants from Nicaragua
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Immigrants from Nicaragua No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,125,238 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,149,436 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kenyan | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 25.6% |
| Range | 16.2% | 24.6% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 8.9% |
| Median | 7.9% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Immigrants from Nicaragua by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |