Immigrants from Latin America vs Australian 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,306,892 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 89.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,001,878 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 90.0%, a difference of 0.21%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Latin America	Australian
Minimum	71.1%	77.7%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	28.9%	22.3%
Mean	89.9%	94.8%
Median	90.9%	95.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	86.8%	92.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	93.4%	98.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.5%	6.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.8%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.7%	4.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Australians by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Cambodia (89.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Native/Alaskan (89.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (89.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (89.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (89.8%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants (90.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Congo (90.0%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (90.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uganda (90.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Brazilian (90.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	75.4 /100 \| #151	Good 90.1%
Tlingit-Haida	74.3 /100 \| #152	Good 90.1%
New Zealanders	73.8 /100 \| #153	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	73.8 /100 \| #154	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	73.6 /100 \| #155	Good 90.1%
Australians	72.4 /100 \| #156	Good 90.0%
Immigrants \| Congo	71.2 /100 \| #157	Good 90.0%
Brazilians	71.0 /100 \| #158	Good 90.0%
South Africans	69.7 /100 \| #159	Good 90.0%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	68.8 /100 \| #160	Good 90.0%
Salvadorans	68.7 /100 \| #161	Good 90.0%
Spanish American Indians	67.0 /100 \| #162	Good 89.9%
Immigrants \| Austria	65.5 /100 \| #163	Good 89.9%
Comanche	63.4 /100 \| #164	Good 89.9%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	62.6 /100 \| #165	Good 89.9%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	62.2 /100 \| #166	Good 89.9%
Immigrants \| Latin America	60.3 /100 \| #167	Good 89.8%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	60.1 /100 \| #168	Good 89.8%
Natives/Alaskans	59.5 /100 \| #169	Average 89.8%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	57.6 /100 \| #170	Average 89.8%
French American Indians	54.4 /100 \| #171	Average 89.8%