Chickasaw vs Luxembourger 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Luxembourger
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chickasaw
Luxembourgers
59.0%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
59.1%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Luxembourger 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,541 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.339 and weighted average of 59.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,657,746 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 59.1%, a difference of 0.11%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 28.3% | 46.0% |
| Maximum | 84.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.0% | 54.0% |
| Mean | 61.9% | 71.7% |
| Median | 63.1% | 69.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.8% | 65.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.0% | 79.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Luxembourgers by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Afghan (59.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Bhutanese (59.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Scotland (58.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Spanish American (58.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and French Canadian (58.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bhutanese (59.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Afghan (59.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Celtic (59.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Spaniard (59.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Laos (59.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 59.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 59.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 59.3% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 59.3% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 59.3% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 59.3% |
| Spaniards | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 59.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 59.2% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 59.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 59.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 59.1% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 59.0% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 59.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 58.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 58.9% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 58.9% |
| Osage | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 58.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 58.8% |
| Mexican American Indians | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 58.7% |
| Portuguese | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 58.6% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 58.6% |