Polish vs Spanish American Indian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Polish
Spanish American Indian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Poles
Spanish American Indians
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Spanish American Indian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,400,436 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,126,627 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 19.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Spanish American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 35.0% | 18.0% |
| Range | 34.5% | 15.2% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 8.0% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Poles by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Lithuanian (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (8.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Cajun (8.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Spaniard (8.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Australian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
| Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |