Australian vs Sudanese 1 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Australian
Sudanese
1 or more Vehicles in Household
1 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Australians
Sudanese
90.0%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
90.3%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Sudanese 1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,001,878 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 90.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,123,391 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 90.3%, a difference of 0.30%.
1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Sudanese |
Minimum | 77.7% | 58.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 22.3% | 41.9% |
Mean | 94.8% | 91.1% |
Median | 95.3% | 91.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 92.4% | 89.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 98.7% | 93.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Sudanese by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants (90.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Congo (90.0%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (90.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uganda (90.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Brazilian (90.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Estonian (90.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (90.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (90.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (90.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (90.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
Syrians | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 90.3% |
Estonians | 85.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 90.3% |
Sudanese | 85.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 90.3% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 81.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 90.2% |
Sioux | 81.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 90.2% |
Bahamians | 80.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 90.2% |
Chileans | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 90.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 78.2 /100 | #148 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 76.7 /100 | #149 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 75.4 /100 | #151 | Good 90.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 74.3 /100 | #152 | Good 90.1% |
New Zealanders | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 73.8 /100 | #154 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 90.1% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #156 | Good 90.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 71.2 /100 | #157 | Good 90.0% |
Brazilians | 71.0 /100 | #158 | Good 90.0% |