Australian vs Immigrants from Lithuania No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Australian
Immigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Australians
Immigrants from Lithuania
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Immigrants from Lithuania No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,715,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,637,222 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.540 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 2.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 22.8% | 14.7% |
| Range | 22.2% | 12.8% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 5.3% |
| Median | 6.3% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Immigrants from Lithuania by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |