Australian vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Australian
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Australians
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,715,583 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,763,936 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 1.6%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Minimum | 0.57% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 22.8% | 20.3% |
Range | 22.2% | 18.7% |
Mean | 7.1% | 8.0% |
Median | 6.3% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |