Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Western Africa 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,812,389 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.742 and weighted average of 86.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,592,771 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Alaskan Athabascan	Immigrants from Western Africa
Minimum	6.2%	53.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	93.8%	47.0%
Mean	71.5%	84.4%
Median	87.4%	86.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	51.2%	80.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	94.9%	90.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	43.7%	10.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	29.8%	9.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	29.6%	9.4%

Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Immigrants from Western Africa by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Indian (Asian) (86.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Okinawan (86.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jamaica (85.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Spain (85.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Paraguayan (85.7%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Immigrants from China (84.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Tohono O'odham (84.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Belize (84.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Haiti (84.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (84.6%, a difference of 0.33%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Australia	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 86.4%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 86.3%
Okinawans	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 86.1%
Indians (Asian)	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 86.0%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 86.0%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 85.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 85.8%
Paraguayans	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 85.7%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 85.7%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 85.5%
Immigrants \| Russia	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 85.4%
Immigrants \| Panama	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 85.4%
Moroccans	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 85.4%
Immigrants \| Greece	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 85.4%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 85.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 84.9%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 84.9%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 84.7%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 84.7%
Immigrants \| Haiti	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 84.7%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 84.6%