Osage Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
COMPARE
Osage
Select to Compare
Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Osage Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
9.5%
UNEMPLOYMENT | WOMEN W/ CHILDREN < 6
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,364,360 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 9.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.2% in unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Osage and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Osage influences an upward or downward trend in the level of unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 within an area, or if Osage simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Osage by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Dutch West Indian (9.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Houma (9.4%, a difference of 0.85%), Marshallese (9.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Potawatomi (9.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Central American Indian (9.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 9.2% |
Immigrants from the Azores | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 9.2% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 9.3% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 9.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 9.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 9.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 9.5% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 9.5% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 9.6% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 9.6% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 9.6% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 9.6% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 9.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 9.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 9.8% |
Osage Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage Data | Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Data |
Minimum | 0.018% | 6.6% |
Maximum | 18.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 18.2% | 93.4% |
Mean | 3.9% | 27.1% |
Median | 1.6% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.80% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 28.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 27.7% |
Correlation Details
Osage Percentile | Sample Size | Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.018% | 80,535,594 | 6.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 1,903,077 | 8.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 430,926 | 14.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 142,924 | 10.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 96,088 | 12.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 58,967 | 11.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 76,507 | 10.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 18,930 | 10.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 30,602 | 10.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 15,135 | 14.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 26,368 | 9.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 3,428 | 42.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.99% | 8,073 | 26.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 6,679 | 14.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 744 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.90% | 87 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.15% | 3,327 | 23.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.62% | 4,140 | 15.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.40% | 1,592 | 48.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.17% | 1,172 | 53.8% |