Welsh vs Luxembourger Unemployment
COMPARE
Welsh
 Luxembourger
 Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Welsh
Luxembourgers
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Luxembourger Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 526,178,789 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,557,593 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 8.1%.
 
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Luxembourger | 
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.30% | 
| Maximum | 37.5% | 9.5% | 
| Range | 35.8% | 9.2% | 
| Mean | 8.7% | 3.3% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 3.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 1.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 4.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 2.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 1.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 1.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Luxembourgers by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Carpatho Rusyn (4.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Scottish (4.7%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Venezuela (4.7%, a difference of 0.69%), Slovene (4.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and Chinese (4.7%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Czech (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Danish (4.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), German (4.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and Norwegian (4.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment | 
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #1  | Exceptional 4.2%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2  | Exceptional 4.3%  | 
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #3  | Exceptional 4.3%  | 
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 4.3%  | 
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 4.4%  | 
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 4.5%  | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 4.5%  | 
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 4.5%  | 
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 4.5%  | 
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| English | 100.0 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 4.7%  |