Danish vs Luxembourger Unemployment
COMPARE
Danish
Luxembourger
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Danes
Luxembourgers
4.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Luxembourger Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,550,686 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,557,593 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 0.25%.

Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.70% | 0.30% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 9.5% |
Range | 36.8% | 9.2% |
Mean | 5.2% | 3.3% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 4.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Luxembourgers by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Czech (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 2.3%), German (4.5%, a difference of 3.1%), Norwegian (4.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and Immigrants from India (4.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Czech (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), German (4.5%, a difference of 3.4%), Norwegian (4.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and Immigrants from India (4.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |