Ugandan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,859,637 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,707,279 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 0.16%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ugandan	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Minimum	2.7%	1.1%
Maximum	24.3%	61.4%
Range	21.6%	60.3%
Mean	9.6%	10.9%
Median	7.8%	8.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.5%	5.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.6%	13.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.1%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.6%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.4%	11.0%

Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Colville (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Kiowa (7.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (7.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Luxembourger (7.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Norway (7.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Colville (7.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Kiowa (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Hungary (7.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Pueblo (7.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Luxembourger (7.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 7.8%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%