Swedish vs Immigrants from Argentina Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,245,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.738 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,800,646 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 0.94%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Swedish	Immigrants from Argentina
Minimum	3.1%	0.80%
Maximum	100.0%	40.8%
Range	96.9%	40.0%
Mean	21.3%	10.5%
Median	8.4%	8.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.8%	6.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	24.6%	12.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.8%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	26.1%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	25.8%	7.5%

Demographics Similar to Swedes and Immigrants from Argentina by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Ukrainian (7.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Slovene (7.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Armenia (7.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Uganda (7.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Korean (7.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Greek (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Scandinavian (7.4%, a difference of 0.18%), European (7.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Jordan (7.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	91.9 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 7.3%
Jordanians	91.5 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 7.3%
Zimbabweans	91.5 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 7.3%
Slovenes	89.2 /100 \| #129	Excellent 7.4%
Swedes	88.4 /100 \| #130	Excellent 7.4%
Ukrainians	88.2 /100 \| #131	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Armenia	87.4 /100 \| #132	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Uganda	86.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	85.7 /100 \| #134	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	85.3 /100 \| #135	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	84.9 /100 \| #136	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	84.6 /100 \| #137	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Norway	84.1 /100 \| #138	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Colombia	83.9 /100 \| #139	Excellent 7.4%
Scandinavians	83.0 /100 \| #140	Excellent 7.4%
Greeks	82.6 /100 \| #141	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Argentina	81.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 7.5%
Koreans	81.3 /100 \| #143	Excellent 7.5%
Europeans	79.1 /100 \| #144	Good 7.5%
Immigrants \| Jordan	78.9 /100 \| #145	Good 7.5%
Japanese	78.9 /100 \| #146	Good 7.5%