Serbian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 18 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,896,879 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 18 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,897,775 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 18 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 18 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Serbian	Immigrants from Lithuania
Minimum	1.2%	1.8%
Maximum	13.6%	16.3%
Range	12.4%	14.5%
Mean	5.2%	5.8%
Median	4.8%	4.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.7%	3.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.0%	5.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.3%	2.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.6%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.6%	3.8%

Demographics Similar to Serbians and Immigrants from Lithuania by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 18 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Austrian (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Icelander (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Irish (5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Fijian (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Romanian (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Croatia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Zimbabwean (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 18 years
Immigrants \| Australia	97.0 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 5.1%
Fijians	96.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 5.1%
Irish	96.8 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 5.1%
Austrians	96.6 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 5.1%
Icelanders	96.6 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 5.1%
Serbians	96.5 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.1 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 5.1%
Albanians	95.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	95.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	95.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 5.1%
Puget Sound Salish	95.8 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 5.1%
Zimbabweans	95.7 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 5.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	95.7 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	95.6 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 5.1%
Bolivians	95.5 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	95.4 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 5.2%
Romanians	95.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 5.2%
Maltese	95.1 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 5.2%
Australians	95.1 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 5.2%
Paraguayans	94.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	94.8 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 5.2%