Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Switzerland Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,041,741 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,055,678 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Luxembourger	Immigrants from Switzerland
Minimum	1.0%	5.3%
Maximum	29.5%	92.3%
Range	28.5%	87.0%
Mean	8.4%	16.9%
Median	5.9%	8.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.3%	6.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.0%	11.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.8%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.4%	24.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.2%	23.5%

Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Immigrants from Switzerland by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Bhutanese (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Kenyan (6.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (6.3%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Asian (6.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Icelander (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Korea (6.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Jordan (6.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Carpatho Rusyn (6.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Luxembourgers	98.3 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	98.3 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 6.2%
Bhutanese	98.2 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| China	98.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 6.2%
Kenyans	98.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	97.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 6.3%
Indians (Asian)	97.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	97.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 6.3%
Palestinians	97.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| France	97.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 6.3%
Scandinavians	97.4 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 6.3%
Belgians	97.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 6.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	96.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	96.7 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 6.3%
Icelanders	96.6 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 6.3%
Asians	96.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.0 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 6.3%