Latvian vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
COMPARE
Latvian
Chinese
Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Comparison
Latvians
Chinese
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 35 TO 44 YEARS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 35 TO 44 YEARS
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,581,244 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,522,420 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 2.8%.
Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 16.0% | 30.5% |
| Range | 15.4% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 5.2% |
| Median | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Chinese by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Swedish (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Cuban (4.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Bolivia (4.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and Tongan (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Carpatho Rusyn (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Pakistan (4.3%, a difference of 0.14%), European (4.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Jordanian (4.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Cubans | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Paraguayans | 99.6 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Scandinavians | 99.5 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.5 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.3 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.3 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.3 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.3 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.2 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Chinese | 99.1 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.1 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Jordanians | 99.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.3% |