Latvian vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
COMPARE
Latvian
Chinese
Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Comparison
Latvians
Chinese
6.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 25 TO 29 YEARS
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 25 TO 29 YEARS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,765,970 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,787,303 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 22.2% |
Range | 98.4% | 21.8% |
Mean | 18.7% | 7.0% |
Median | 7.0% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.8% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Chinese by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Australia (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Venezuelan (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Mongolian (6.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Yugoslavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Filipino (6.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Morocco (6.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Taiwanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Filipinos | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Chinese | 99.6 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Yugoslavians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Taiwanese | 99.5 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.5 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Ethiopians | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Indonesians | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Fijians | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Mongolians | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Venezuelans | 99.1 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 6.2% |
German Russians | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 6.2% |