Jordanian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,717,249 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,981,600 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 0.10%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Jordanian	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Minimum	4.8%	0.10%
Maximum	32.3%	54.2%
Range	27.5%	54.1%
Mean	11.3%	9.8%
Median	8.6%	7.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.7%	6.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.4%	10.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.7%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.8%	8.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.7%	8.1%

Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Zimbabwean (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Pakistani (7.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from South Africa (7.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Zaire (7.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Slovene (7.4%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Pakistani (7.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (7.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from South Africa (7.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Zaire (7.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Chile (7.3%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Armenians	95.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Kenya	95.4 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 7.3%
Serbians	94.5 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 7.3%
South Africans	94.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 7.3%
Iraqis	93.9 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| Chile	93.5 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	93.5 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| Zaire	93.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| South Africa	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 7.3%
Pakistanis	92.2 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	91.9 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 7.3%
Jordanians	91.5 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 7.3%
Zimbabweans	91.5 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 7.3%
Slovenes	89.2 /100 \| #129	Excellent 7.4%
Swedes	88.4 /100 \| #130	Excellent 7.4%
Ukrainians	88.2 /100 \| #131	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Armenia	87.4 /100 \| #132	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Uganda	86.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	85.7 /100 \| #134	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	85.3 /100 \| #135	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	84.9 /100 \| #136	Excellent 7.4%