Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Bulgarian Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 418,199,861 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,290,178 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 0.68%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Central Asia	Bulgarian
Minimum	0.40%	0.50%
Maximum	16.5%	23.3%
Range	16.1%	22.8%
Mean	5.1%	6.3%
Median	4.7%	4.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.2%	3.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.4%	6.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.2%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.2%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.2%	4.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Bulgarians by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Thailand (4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Austrian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Senegal (4.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Finnish (4.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Choctaw (4.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Maltese (4.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (4.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from England (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Germany (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Syrian (4.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Immigrants \| Netherlands	97.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Ethiopians	97.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
French	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Syrians	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Bulgarians	96.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Maltese	96.5 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Romania	96.4 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| England	96.3 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Germany	96.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.7%
Ukrainians	96.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Morocco	95.7 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.7%
Macedonians	95.7 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.7%
Albanians	95.3 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	95.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.7%
Finns	94.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Senegal	94.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	93.7 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	93.0 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.7%
Austrians	91.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Choctaw	90.3 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	90.2 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.8%