Immigrants from Lithuania vs Iroquois Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,251,383 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.322 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,569,055 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.16%.

Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Lithuania	Iroquois
Minimum	2.0%	0.80%
Maximum	21.2%	25.7%
Range	19.1%	24.9%
Mean	10.7%	11.0%
Median	10.1%	10.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.9%	8.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.7%	14.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.9%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.8%	5.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	4.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Iroquois by Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

In terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Kuwait (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (11.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Thailand (11.3%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Pakistani (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (11.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Thailand (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years
Lithuanians	94.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 11.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	94.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	94.4 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 11.3%
Nicaraguans	94.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 11.3%
Estonians	94.2 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 11.3%
Celtics	94.0 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 11.3%
Pakistanis	94.0 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 11.3%
Iroquois	93.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	93.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	93.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	93.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	93.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 11.3%
Chileans	93.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	92.9 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	92.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 11.3%
Iranians	92.0 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	91.5 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| France	90.3 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Austria	90.3 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 11.3%
Fijians	90.2 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	89.9 /100 \| #114	Excellent 11.3%