Immigrants from Latvia vs Bahamian Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,059,408 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,279,654 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 0.30%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Latvia	Bahamian
Minimum	5.8%	0.80%
Maximum	100.0%	18.6%
Range	94.2%	17.8%
Mean	21.0%	8.2%
Median	12.0%	8.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.0%	4.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.1%	10.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.1%	6.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	25.8%	4.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	24.7%	4.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Bahamians by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Potawatomi (7.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Moroccan (7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Egypt (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Egypt (7.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Malaysia (7.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Moroccan (7.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Potawatomi (7.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Chile (7.8%, a difference of 0.35%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 7.8%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%
Moroccans	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 7.8%
Bahamians	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Egypt	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 7.9%
Filipinos	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 7.9%
Ottawa	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 7.9%
Iranians	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 7.9%
Indonesians	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 7.9%
Uruguayans	99.9 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 7.9%