Immigrants from Canada vs Indian (Asian) Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,343,768 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,470,317 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%.

Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Canada	Indian (Asian)
Minimum	2.2%	1.3%
Maximum	55.6%	8.8%
Range	53.4%	7.5%
Mean	12.9%	4.3%
Median	5.6%	4.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.8%	3.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	15.9%	5.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.0%	1.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.0%	1.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	14.6%	1.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada and Indians (Asian) by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Immigrants from France (4.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Scottish (4.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Yugoslavian (4.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Russian (4.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Iranian (4.5%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Kenyan (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Asia (4.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Australia (4.4%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
Indians (Asian)	96.0 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	95.9 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 4.4%
Kenyans	95.7 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Scotland	95.6 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Asia	95.6 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Chile	95.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Kenya	95.0 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 4.4%
Serbians	94.9 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	94.8 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Latvia	94.8 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 4.4%
Egyptians	94.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 4.5%
Australians	94.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	94.3 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 4.5%
Estonians	94.3 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 4.5%
Iranians	93.9 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 4.5%
Russians	93.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 4.5%
Yugoslavians	93.6 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 4.5%
Scottish	93.5 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| France	92.5 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Canada	92.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 4.5%