Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Indonesian Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,671,818 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,246,641 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar	Indonesian
Minimum	0.70%	0.20%
Maximum	13.7%	14.5%
Range	13.0%	14.3%
Mean	6.7%	6.4%
Median	6.5%	6.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.5%	4.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.7%	7.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.2%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.7%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.6%	2.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Indonesians by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Netherlands (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Turkish (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Turkey (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from Kenya (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Fijian (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Ethiopian (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Jordanian (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Serbia (6.1%, a difference of 0.33%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.5 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 6.1%
Ethiopians	99.4 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 6.1%
Indonesians	99.3 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 6.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	99.3 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 6.1%
Fijians	99.3 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 6.1%
Jordanians	99.3 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 6.1%
Czechs	99.2 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 6.2%
Mongolians	99.2 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 6.2%
Venezuelans	99.1 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 6.2%
Latvians	99.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 6.2%
German Russians	99.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 6.2%
Soviet Union	98.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 6.2%
Burmese	98.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Turkey	98.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 6.2%
Turks	98.8 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 6.2%
Swedes	98.8 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	98.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	98.6 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 6.2%