Creek vs Immigrants from Israel Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Creek
Immigrants from Israel
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from Israel
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
19.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Immigrants from Israel Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,704,441 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,717,487 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.44%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Immigrants from Israel |
| Minimum | 0.90% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 16.7% | 8.9% |
| Range | 15.8% | 7.8% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 5.2% |
| Median | 5.2% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Immigrants from Israel by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Choctaw (5.4%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
| Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
| Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
| Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
| Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
| Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
| Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |