Chinese vs Syrian Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Syrian
Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Comparison
Chinese
Syrians
6.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 25 TO 29 YEARS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 25 TO 29 YEARS
82.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Syrian Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,787,303 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,736,419 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 6.7%.
Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Syrian |
Minimum | 0.40% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 27.3% |
Range | 21.8% | 26.0% |
Mean | 7.0% | 10.1% |
Median | 6.3% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Yugoslavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Filipino (6.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Morocco (6.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Taiwanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years |
New Zealanders | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 99.7 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 6.0% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 6.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Filipinos | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Chinese | 99.6 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Yugoslavians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Taiwanese | 99.5 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.5 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Ethiopians | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Indonesians | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Brazilian (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (6.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Dutch (6.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Laotian (6.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Chile (6.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years |
Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #118 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 84.9 /100 | #119 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 84.5 /100 | #121 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 6.5% |
Laotians | 83.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 6.5% |
Arabs | 82.5 /100 | #124 | Excellent 6.5% |
Syrians | 82.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 6.5% |
Brazilians | 81.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 6.5% |
Dutch | 80.6 /100 | #127 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Chile | 80.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 6.5% |
Sri Lankans | 80.3 /100 | #129 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.9 /100 | #130 | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 79.2 /100 | #131 | Good 6.5% |
Poles | 76.6 /100 | #132 | Good 6.5% |