Chickasaw vs Burmese Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Burmese
Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Comparison
Chickasaw
Burmese
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 45 TO 54 YEARS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 45 TO 54 YEARS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Burmese Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,306,851 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,611,783 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 0.31%.

Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Burmese |
Minimum | 0.70% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 10.0% |
Range | 21.2% | 8.6% |
Mean | 6.3% | 4.2% |
Median | 4.8% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 4.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Burmese by Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Irish (4.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Latvian (4.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jordan (4.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and Basque (4.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Finnish (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (4.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Luxembourger (4.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Finns | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.6 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Basques | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Irish | 99.5 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Latvians | 99.4 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Okinawans | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.2 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.3% |