Polish vs Burmese Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
COMPARE
Polish
Burmese
Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Comparison
Poles
Burmese
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 45 TO 54 YEARS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 45 TO 54 YEARS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Burmese Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,066,106 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Poles and unemployment rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,611,783 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 0.26%.
Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Burmese |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 22.5% | 10.0% |
Range | 21.5% | 8.6% |
Mean | 4.4% | 4.2% |
Median | 4.1% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 4.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Burmese by Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Irish (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Latvian (4.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Basque (4.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Finnish (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (4.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Luxembourger (4.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Finns | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.6 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Basques | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Irish | 99.5 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Latvians | 99.4 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Okinawans | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.2 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.3% |