Ute vs Tsimshian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Tsimshian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Tsimshian
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
50.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Tsimshian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,537,245 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,622,353 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 31.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 9.2% | 9.9% |
Maximum | 86.0% | 36.4% |
Range | 76.9% | 26.5% |
Mean | 34.2% | 19.7% |
Median | 26.5% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.5% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.7% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.2% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 21.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 21.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Colombia (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (16.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Syria (16.5%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Germany | 63.6 /100 | #166 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 55.4 /100 | #167 | Average 16.3% |
South Americans | 55.3 /100 | #168 | Average 16.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 53.6 /100 | #169 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.7 /100 | #170 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 51.3 /100 | #171 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Uruguayans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 49.0 /100 | #175 | Average 16.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 48.2 /100 | #176 | Average 16.5% |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |