Ukrainian vs Samoan Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Samoan
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Ukrainians
Samoans
10.1%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ukrainian vs Samoan Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,354,944 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.874 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,422,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ukrainian | Samoan |
Minimum | 0.61% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.3% |
Range | 99.4% | 47.5% |
Mean | 20.7% | 10.9% |
Median | 9.9% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.7% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ukrainians and Samoans by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Burmese (10.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Romanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.1%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Turkish (10.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 97.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Romanians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Burmese | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 96.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.1% |