Tsimshian vs Potawatomi Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Potawatomi
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Potawatomi
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Potawatomi Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,624,889 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,745,310 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.80%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Potawatomi |
| Minimum | 8.5% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 21.8% | 59.6% |
| Range | 13.2% | 55.1% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 18.0% |
| Median | 13.1% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Potawatomi by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Alaskan Athabascan (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |