Subsaharan African vs Potawatomi Male Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Potawatomi
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Potawatomi
13.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Potawatomi Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,378,936 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.706 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,745,310 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 2.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Potawatomi |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 59.6% |
| Range | 99.2% | 55.1% |
| Mean | 20.0% | 18.0% |
| Median | 13.9% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Potawatomi by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Iroquois (13.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |