Tsimshian vs Burmese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Burmese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Tsimshian
Burmese
11.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Burmese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,575,613 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.398 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,212,415 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 13.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Burmese |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 52.6% | 43.4% |
| Range | 49.7% | 42.2% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 10.3% |
| Median | 14.4% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Burmese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Thai (11.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from India (11.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.93%), Bulgarian (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |